[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070916180930.GA9455@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:09:30 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Matej Laitl <strohel@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] menuconfig: distinguish between selected-by-another options and comments
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
>
> Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable, but still
> visible, a select is usually involved.
On i86_64 (but I think the arch does not matter).
make defconfig
make menuconfig
At top-level menu I see:
--- Enable the block layer --->
In block/Kconfig we have:
menuconfig BLOCK
bool "Enable the block layer" if EMBEDDED
default y
If EMBEDDED == n then we see the above.
And this was my first experience with this patch - and it
took me some thoughts to realise it was the "if EMBEDDED" part
that made it look like -*-
So maybe not something we see in many places but it is
there in the top-level menu.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists