[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <46EE5BAB.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:49:15 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: <sam@...nborg.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tristate choices with mixed tristate and boolean
values
>>> Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> 16.09.07 19:29 >>>
>On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> --- linux-2.6.23-rc5/scripts/kconfig/menu.c 2007-09-07 16:48:23.000000000 +0200
>> +++ 2.6.23-rc5-tristate-choices/scripts/kconfig/menu.c 2007-09-03 10:29:41.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -235,16 +235,23 @@ void menu_finalize(struct menu *parent)
>> sym = parent->sym;
>> if (parent->list) {
>> if (sym && sym_is_choice(sym)) {
>> - /* find the first choice value and find out choice type */
>> + /* find out choice type */
>> + enum symbol_type type = S_UNKNOWN;
>> +
>> for (menu = parent->list; menu; menu = menu->next) {
>> - if (menu->sym) {
>> - current_entry = parent;
>> - menu_set_type(menu->sym->type);
>> - current_entry = menu;
>> - menu_set_type(sym->type);
>> - break;
>> + if (menu->sym && menu->sym->type != S_UNKNOWN) {
>> + if (type == S_UNKNOWN)
>> + type = menu->sym->type;
>> + if (type != S_BOOLEAN)
>> + break;
>> + if (menu->sym->type == S_TRISTATE) {
>> + type = S_TRISTATE;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>> + current_entry = parent;
>> + menu_set_type(type);
>> parentdep = expr_alloc_symbol(sym);
>> } else if (parent->prompt)
>> parentdep = parent->prompt->visible.expr;
>
>If I understand it correctly this makes possible to override the type of
>choice symbol, so this loop should only be done if the type is not
>S_UNKNOWN.
I think it is better to do it this way, as it results in a (correct) warning from
menu_set_type() if the choice type is inconsistently being overridden.
>> @@ -253,7 +260,16 @@ void menu_finalize(struct menu *parent)
>>
>> for (menu = parent->list; menu; menu = menu->next) {
>> basedep = expr_transform(menu->dep);
>> - basedep = expr_alloc_and(expr_copy(parentdep), basedep);
>> + dep = parentdep;
>> + if (sym && sym_is_choice(sym) && menu->sym) {
>> + enum symbol_type type = menu->sym->type;
>> +
>> + if (type == S_UNKNOWN)
>> + type = sym->type;
>> + if (type != S_TRISTATE)
>> + dep = expr_alloc_comp(E_EQUAL, sym, &symbol_yes);
>> + }
>> + basedep = expr_alloc_and(expr_copy(dep), basedep);
>> basedep = expr_eliminate_dups(basedep);
>> menu->dep = basedep;
>> if (menu->sym)
>
>Hmm, if you want to do it this way, I'd prefer you add a parentdep_bool
>and simply do:
>
> dep = (menu->sym && menu->sym->type != S_TRISTATE) ?
> parentdep_bool : parentdep;
That would lose the S_UNKNOWN compare (menu->sym->type may not be set
at this point, yet, and would later get defaulted to tristate if the choice is such).
>Otherwise it looks ok.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists