linux-kernel - Re: VM/VFS bug with large amount of memory and file systems?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070917163257.331c7605@twins>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:32:57 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	marc.smith@...ail.mcc.edu
Subject: Re: VM/VFS bug with large amount of memory and file systems?

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:04:05 +0100 Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>
wrote:

> They files  
> are attached this time rather than inlined so people don't complain  
> about line wrapping!  (No doubt people will not complain about them  
> being attached!  )-:)

I switched mailer after I learnt about flowed stuffs. Still,
appreciated.

> If I read it correctly it appears all of low memory is eaten up by  
> buffer_heads.
> 
> <quote>
> # name            <active_objs> <num_objs> <objsize> <objperslab>  
> <pagesperslab>
> : tunables <limit> <batchcount> <sharedfactor> : slabdata  
> <active_slabs> <num_s
> labs> <sharedavail>
> buffer_head       12569528 12569535     56   67    1 : tunables   
> 120   60    8 :
> slabdata 187605 187605      0
> </quote>
> 
> That is 671MiB of low memory in buffer_heads.
> 
> But why is the kernel not reclaiming them by getting rid of the page  
> cache pages they are attached to or even leaving the pages around but  
> killing their buffers?

Well, you see, you have this very odd configuration where:

11GB highmem
 1GB normal

pagecache pages go into highmem
buggerheads go into normal

I'm guessing there is no pressure at all on zone_highmem so the
kernel will not try to reclaim pagecache. And because the pagecache
pages are happily sitting there, the buggerheads are pinned and do not
get reclaimed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/