lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070917163954.1c3b91fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:54 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	travis@....com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] ppc64: Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu data
 array (v3)

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:28:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> 	the topology (on my POWERPC5+ box) is not correct:
> 
> cpu0/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu1/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu2/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu3/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> 
> it used to be:
> 
> cpu0/topology/thread_siblings:00000003
> cpu1/topology/thread_siblings:00000003
> cpu2/topology/thread_siblings:0000000c
> cpu3/topology/thread_siblings:0000000c

This would be because we are setting up the cpu_sibling map before we
call setup_per_cpu_areas().

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ