[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070917163954.1c3b91fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:54 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: travis@....com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] ppc64: Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu data
array (v3)
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:28:31 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> the topology (on my POWERPC5+ box) is not correct:
>
> cpu0/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu1/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu2/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
> cpu3/topology/thread_siblings:0000000f
>
> it used to be:
>
> cpu0/topology/thread_siblings:00000003
> cpu1/topology/thread_siblings:00000003
> cpu2/topology/thread_siblings:0000000c
> cpu3/topology/thread_siblings:0000000c
This would be because we are setting up the cpu_sibling map before we
call setup_per_cpu_areas().
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists