lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46EEB7A4.9040903@sandeen.net>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:21:40 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
CC:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext34: ensure do_split leaves enough free space in both
 blocks

Eric Sandeen wrote:
> The do_split() function for htree dir blocks is intended to split a
> leaf block to make room for a new entry.  It sorts the entries in the
> original block by hash value, then moves the last half of the entries to 
> the new block - without accounting for how much space this actually moves.  
> (IOW, it moves half of the entry *count* not half of the entry *space*).
> If by chance we have both large & small entries, and we move only the 
> smallest entries, and we have a large new entry to insert, we may not have 
> created enough space for it.

(btw, the upshot of this is that in add_dirent_to_buf(),
memcpy(de->name, name, namelen) will overshoot the buffer and actually
corrupt memory.)

:(

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ