linux-kernel - [PATCH 16/24] nfs: check mnt instead of superblock directly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070917182739.6987C126@kernel>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:27:39 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To:	akpm@...l.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/24] nfs: check mnt instead of superblock directly


If we depend on the inodes for writeability, we will not
catch the r/o mounts when implemented.

This patches uses __mnt_want_write().  It does not guarantee
that the mount will stay writeable after the check.  But,
this is OK for one of the checks because it is just for a
printk().

The other two are probably unnecessary and duplicate existing
checks in the VFS.  This won't make them better checks than
before, but it will make them detect r/o mounts.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
---

 lxc-dave/fs/nfs/dir.c  |    3 ++-
 lxc-dave/fs/nfsd/vfs.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/nfs/dir.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb fs/nfs/dir.c
--- lxc/fs/nfs/dir.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb	2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
+++ lxc-dave/fs/nfs/dir.c	2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -997,7 +997,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *
 	if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
 		return 0;
 	/* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
-	if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
+	if (__mnt_is_readonly(nd->mnt) &&
+	    (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
 		return 0;
 	return 1;
 }
diff -puN fs/nfsd/vfs.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb fs/nfsd/vfs.c
--- lxc/fs/nfsd/vfs.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb	2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
+++ lxc-dave/fs/nfsd/vfs.c	2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -1853,7 +1853,7 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, 
 		inode->i_mode,
 		IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)?	" immut" : "",
 		IS_APPEND(inode)?	" append" : "",
-		IS_RDONLY(inode)?	" ro" : "");
+		__mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_mnt)?	" ro" : "");
 	dprintk("      owner %d/%d user %d/%d\n",
 		inode->i_uid, inode->i_gid, current->fsuid, current->fsgid);
 #endif
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, 
 	 */
 	if (!(acc & MAY_LOCAL_ACCESS))
 		if (acc & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_SATTR | MAY_TRUNC)) {
-			if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) || IS_RDONLY(inode))
+			if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) || __mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_mnt))
 				return nfserr_rofs;
 			if (/* (acc & MAY_WRITE) && */ IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
 				return nfserr_perm;
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/