linux-kernel - Re: Lossy interrupts on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1190056703.2995.11.camel@chaos>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:18:23 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lossy interrupts on x86_64


On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 12:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > does it make any difference when you boot the box with:
> >
> > nohz=off
> >
> > on the kernel command line ?
> 
> Yeah, that makes a difference:  the box hangs when I start receiving 
> vblank interrupts instead.  However it's not a hard hang, I think X 
> just becomes unresponsive.  I can still hit the power button on the 
> laptop and the machine shuts down gracefully, but ctl-alt-delete and 
> ctl-alt-backspace don't work.  So X is probably still up and in charge 
> of input but may not be getting any more timeslices or something.

Eeek, that sounds scary. Can you add "highres=off" as well ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/