[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46EEE7B7.1070206@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:46:47 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
marc.smith@...ail.mcc.edu
Subject: Re: VM/VFS bug with large amount of memory and file systems?
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:11:14 -0400
> Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
>> IIRC I simply kept a list of all buffer heads and walked
>> that to reclaim pages when the number of buffer heads is
>> too high (and we need memory). This list can be maintained
>> in places where we already hold the lock for the buffer head
>> freelist, so there should be no additional locking overhead
>> (again, IIRC).
>
> Christoph's slab defragmentation code should permit us to fix this:
> grab a page of buffer_heads off the slab lists, trylock the page,
> strip the buffer_heads. I think that would be a better approach
> if we can get it going because it's more general.
Is the slab defragmentation code in -mm or upstream already
or can I find it on the mailing list?
I've implemented code like you describe already, just give me
a few days to become familiar with the slab defragmentation
code and I'll get you a patch.
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists