[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070917212257.GA27980@stusta.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:22:57 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Falk <oliver@...ux-kernel.at>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axp-list@...hat.com,
Jay Estabrook <jay.estabrook@...com>,
ac-admin@...ts.anotherbloody.com, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 alpha unistd.h changes
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:33:07PM +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Oliver!
> At Alphacore we used to patch the kernel headers for a while now; We
> added syscalls __NR_openat (447) until __NR_tee (466).
Why did your numbers differ from the numbers that were used in the
upstream kernel?
The Alpha maintainers (Cc's added) might now better what happened here.
> However, since 2.6.23 these syscall where added upstream, but with
> different syscall numbers; What happens is the following:
>...
These syscalls were added in 2.6.22, not 2.6.23, and are therefore in
the officially released kernel since more than two months.
Changing a userspace ABI that has already been part of an officially
released kernel because someone patched other syscall numbers into his
private kernel doesn't sound like a good solution.
> Best,
> Oliver
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists