linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709171423230.29704@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Configurable reclaim batch size

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:

> Please do let me know if someone finds a good standard test for it or a
> way to stress reclaim. I've heard AIM7 come up often, but never been
> able to push it much. I should retry.

AIM7 does small computing loads reflecting an earlier time. I wish there 
was something better reflecting large computing loads of today. The tests 
that I know of require MPI and other libraries and are not that suitable 
for kernel hackers.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/