[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46EEFA34.9000508@tmr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:05:40 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>
CC: linux-dvb@...uxtv.org, video4linux-list@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Userspace tuner
Dâniel Fraga wrote:
> Well, I'd like to see Linus' opinion about this, because while
> programmers keep discussing this, users are waiting forever... so if
> Markus has a concrete and better solution, why don't use it?
>
> And as far as I know, Markus is the programmer who is most
> interested in this code. I didn't see anybody else in the world doing
> his work...
>
> And I always had a impression that if most of things could be
> done in user space, than it will be better (for example, devfs -> udev).
> Why do everything in kernel space? Lets put *less* code in the kernel,
> not more code. And besides that, code in user space can be changed
> easily. Code in kernel has to wait a long time for Linus to accept (*if*
> he accepts).
>
The problem with user space drivers is that it encourages binary only
drivers, drivers which work only for a limited set of hardware, and
other means to reduce choice for the user. There's a reason why binary
modules make the kernel tainted, I have to feel that this is more and
worse of same.
Linus will have an opinion, no doubt.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists