[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190125901.6528.7.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:31:41 -0500
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, sct@...hat.com,
adilger@...sterfs.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Shish <shish@...shnet.org>,
Karl Meyer <adhocrocker@...il.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Florian Lohoff <flo@...822.org>,
Toralf F?rster <toralf.foerster@....de>
Subject: Re: [2/3] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions v2
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 16:24 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73
> > Last known good : ?
> > Submitter : Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
> > Caused-By : ?
> > Handled-By : ?
> > Status : unknown
> I thought Shaggy asked Oliver about some details (and he did not
> answer so far) so I'd assume Shaggy is handling this.
I've put it on the back-burner since I haven't heard back from Oliver.
I still haven't found out whether or not it is a regression. I'm not
too concerned about fixing it right away. I don't think jfs on flash is
very important.
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists