linux-kernel - Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070918.112337.74737433.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mchan@...adcom.com
Cc:	vda.linux@...glemail.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images

From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:45:14 -0700

> On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:23 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > Do you have any plans to switch to request_firmware() interface,
> > which will allow you to avoid keeping firmware in unswappable kernel
> > memory and thus free ~80k?
> 
> Matching the correct version of the firmware with the driver is the main
> issue.
> 
> David, what's your opinion on this?

I don't like it because it means people have to setup full initrd's
in order to do network booting with such network cards.

But the days of my opinion mattering on that issue are long gone,
the momentum is just too greatly behind using request_firmware()
across the board, so there is no reason for bnx2 to be any different.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/