[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709181935540.14973@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:38:52 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wake up mandatory locks waiter on chmod (v2)
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:54:56PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > It gets even better when you throw mmap() into the mix :-)
>
> Hm. Documentation/mandatory.txt claims that it mandatory locks and
> mmap() with MAP_SHARED exclude each other, but I can't see where that's
> enfoced. That file doesn't make any mention of the above race.
I believe the locks_verify_locked() call from mm/mmap.c prevents
mmap'ing shared-write a file with mandatory locks in force;
and the mapping_writably_mapped() calls from fs/locks.c prevent
mandatory locking on a file while it's mmap'ed shared-write.
Though I think there's no lock to prevent those checks racing,
so it's not quite watertight.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists