linux-kernel - Re: Scheduler benchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070918045328.GD10199@1wt.eu>
Date:	Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:53:28 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Rob Hussey <robjhussey@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler benchmarks - a follow-up

Hi Rob,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:30:05AM -0400, Rob Hussey wrote:
> I should have pointed out before that I don't really have a dual-core
> system, just a P4 with Hyper-Threading (I loosely used core to refer
> to processor).

Just for reference, we call them "siblings", not "cores" on HT. I believe
that a line "Sibling:" appears in /proc/cpuinfo BTW.

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/