[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190191368.8687.5.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:42:48 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Tong Li <tong.n.li@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, dimm <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [git] CFS-devel, group scheduler, fixes
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:51 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> The scenario which was previously cured was this:
> taskset -c 1 nice -n 0 ./massive_intr 2 9999
> taskset -c 1 nice -n 5 ./massive_intr 2 9999
> click link
> (http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~shubu/talks/cachescrub-prdc2004.ppt) to bring
> up browser and OpenOffice Impress.
>
> Xorg (at nice -5 + above scenario) latency samples:
> se.wait_max : 57985337
> se.wait_max : 25163510
> se.wait_max : 37005538
> se.wait_max : 66986511
> se.wait_max : 53990868
> se.wait_max : 80976761
> se.wait_max : 96967501
> se.wait_max : 80989254
> se.wait_max : 53990897
> se.wait_max : 181963905
> se.wait_max : 85985181
To be doubly sure of the effect on the pinned tasks + migrating Xorg
scenario, I just ran the above test 10 times with virgin devel source.
Maximum Xorg latency was 20ms.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists