linux-kernel - Re: iso9660 vs udf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3ir66zz7x.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:11:46 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Andries E. Brouwer" <Andries.Brouwer@....nl>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iso9660 vs udf

Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> writes:

> What happened here is simply that in the absence of a "-t" option,
> mount(8) defaulted (probably due to incorrect heuristics?) to UDF for
> some reason, thereby obviously failing.

I think the CD contains both ISO-9660 and UDF filesystems, but the
latter is just faulty.

The disc would need to be analyzed.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/