linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070919113737.GA18177@Krystal>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:37:38 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc:	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code

* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca) wrote:
> The marker activation functions sits in kernel/marker.c. A hash table is used
> to keep track of the registered probes and armed markers, so the markers within
> a newly loaded module that should be active can be activated at module load
> time.
> 
> marker_query has been removed. marker_get_first, marker_get_next and
> marker_release should be used as iterators on the markers.
> 
> Changelog:
> - markers_mutex now nests inside module_mutex rather than the opposite.
> - Iteration on modules is now done in module.c.
> - module_mutex is not exported anymore.
> 
 [...]
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h	2007-09-14 10:11:18.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h	2007-09-14 10:11:31.000000000 -0400
> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
>  /* .data section */
>  #define DATA_DATA							\
>  	*(.data)							\
> -	*(.data.init.refok)
> +	*(.data.init.refok)						\
> +	. = ALIGN(8);							\
> +	VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__start___markers) = .;				\
> +	*(__markers)							\
> +	VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___markers) = .;
>  
>  #define RO_DATA(align)							\
>  	. = ALIGN((align));						\
> @@ -129,6 +133,11 @@
>  		VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__stop___immediate) = .;			\
>  	}								\
>  									\
> +	/* Markers: strings */						\
> +        __markers_strings : AT(ADDR(__markers_strings) - LOAD_OFFSET) {	\
> +		*(__markers_strings)					\
> + 	}								\
> +									\
>  	/* Kernel symbol table: strings */				\
>          __ksymtab_strings : AT(ADDR(__ksymtab_strings) - LOAD_OFFSET) {	\
>  		*(__ksymtab_strings)					\
[...]

Do you think I should also remove the __markers_strings section from here ?

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/