linux-kernel - [PATCH] Use list_first_entry in locks_wake_up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46F11997.7030005@openvz.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:44:07 +0400
From:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use list_first_entry in locks_wake_up_blocks

This routine deletes all the elements from the list
with the "while (!list_empty())" loop, and we already
have a list_first_entry() macro to help it look nicer :)

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>

---

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 746dc70..5fa072a 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -534,7 +534,9 @@ static void locks_insert_block(struct fi
 static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker)
 {
 	while (!list_empty(&blocker->fl_block)) {
-		struct file_lock *waiter = list_entry(blocker->fl_block.next,
+		struct file_lock *waiter;
+
+		waiter = list_first_entry(&blocker->fl_block,
 				struct file_lock, fl_block);
 		__locks_delete_block(waiter);
 		if (waiter->fl_lmops && waiter->fl_lmops->fl_notify)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/