linux-kernel - Re: iso9660 vs udf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070919132327.GF2782@petra.dvoda.cz>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:23:27 +0200
From:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
To:	"Andries E. Brouwer" <Andries.Brouwer@....nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iso9660 vs udf

On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.

 I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb). Also try:

     # blkid -c /dev/null /dev/cdrom
     # /lib/udev/vol_id  /dev/cdrom

 Maybe vol_id provides better information -- the udf/iso code in
 libblkid seems poorer that in libvolume_id.

> If anybody feels responsible for mount and/or this kernel area
> we might discuss.

 mount(8) --> util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org

        Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/