[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40f31dec0709190807k5ea36ce8h615764a49c49efc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:07:17 +0300
From: "Nick Kossifidis" <mickflemm@...il.com>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify pci_iomap() usage for MMIO-only devices
2007/9/19, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> > If you use ioport_map/unmap, then you really *should* access them with the
> > proper iomem accessors (ioread/iowrite). The fact that it may happen to
> > work (when using the default lib/iomap.c implementation, at least) on
> > some architectures and with the current implementation still doesn't mean
> > that you should necessarily use readb/writeb.
>
> Another reason we should enforce the use of ioread/iowrite is that some
> platforms do daft things like map mmio type devices through indirect
> register access. Sparc PCMCIA is a classic example. The only sane way to
> make these work is to require ioread/iowrite is used with iomap
>
Hmm, we 've had bug reports about driver (madwifi-old-openhal) not
working on Sparc64, can someone test if this is the case (the fact
that we used readl/writel instead of ioread/iowrite on
madwifi-old-openhal) ? It was really weird because we handle
big-endian machines ok (madwifi-old-openhal on ppc worked fine).
(ath5k was based on madwifi-old-openhal)
--
GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB
As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-)
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists