[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F14A58.60904@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:12:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] Immediate Values - i386 Optimization
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Ok, let's have a good look at what we want:
>
> 1 - get a pointer to the beginning of the immediate value within the
> instruction.
> 2 - make sure that the immediate value, within the instruction, is
> written to atomically wrt all CPUs, even on older architectures
> where non aligned writes are not atomic.
>
I think you'll find that even on modern architectures cross-cacheline
writes aren't atomic.
Anyway, disregard the bit I mentioned about one byte longer; I've been
staring myself too blind at instruction variants lately (lots of
arguments about how to generate various instructions using NASM syntax).
>
> * 4 bytes
> B8 + rd MOV r32, imm32 (1 byte opcode)
> C7 /0 MOV r/m32, imm32 (2 bytes opcode)
> (the 2 bytes opcode can be a problem)
>
If gas generates the C7 opcodes by default, then that's a bug, nothing less.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists