lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:29:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk> cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> Subject: Re: [03/17] is_vmalloc_addr(): Check if an address is within the vmalloc boundaries On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > There even is such a function already in mm/sparse.c::vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() > with pretty identical content. I would suggest either this new inline should > go away completely and use the existing one and export it or the existing one > should go away and the inline should be used. It seems silly to have two > functions with different names doing exactly the same thing! Just in case you have not noticed: This patchset removes the vaddr_in_vmalloc_area() in sparse.c - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists