[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F16CC1.9090302@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 11:38:57 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX
Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:02:00AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
>>>on UDP/RAW and it's certainly possible to connect() to that.
>>
>>Where do you get this from? And where is this implemented? I don't
>
>
> Sorry it's actually loopback, not broadcast as implemented in Linux.
> In Linux it's implemented in ip_route_output_slow(). Essentially
> converted to 127.0.0.1
>
> I think it's traditional BSD behaviour but couldn't find it on
> a quick look in FreeBSD source (but haven't looked very intensively)
One has to set their way-back machine pretty far back to find the *BSD
bits which used 0.0.0.0 as the "all nets, all subnets" (to mis-use a
term) broadcast IPv4 address when sending. Perhaps as far back as the
time before HP-UX 7 or SunOS4. The bit errors in my dimm memory get
pretty dense that far back...
It has hung-on in various places (stacks) as an "accepted" broadcast IP
in the receive path, but not the send path for quite possibly decades now.
rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists