linux-kernel - Disk I/O degraded performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c424c7d0709191309s283a255au9e6841634c18204c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:09:12 +0200
From:	"Ramon Chimeno" <ramon.chimeno@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Disk I/O degraded performance

Hi all

I migrated one of my server from kernel 2.6.18 to the latest 2.6.22
and I experienced lower disk performance for processes that open file
with the O_DIRECT flag.

I did a very simple test program that opens two files with O_DIRECT
flag and reads the files to end. I monitored the time spent to read
the files and I have ~ 40% of difference between 2.6.18 and 2.6.22.

For information, the files are stored on a XFS partition which is part
of a software raid-5 block device (the raid-5 is made with 3 SATA
drives).

Does that make sense to you gurus ? Of course, I didn't change the
configuration (task scheduler, HZ, default I/O scheduler, ...) between
the two kernels.

For information, the code of my test program is pasted below (I
snipped the #include part):
----------------------8<----------------------8<----------------------
#define BSIZE (512*512)
int main(int ac, char * av[])
{
 int   fd[2];
 char* buffer;

 if (ac != 3)  {
   printf("USAGE: %s <FILE-1> <FILE-2>\n", av[0]);
   exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 }

 if ((fd[0] = open(av[1], O_RDONLY|O_DIRECT)) == -1)
   exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 if ((fd[1] = open(av[2], O_RDONLY|O_DIRECT)) == -1)
   exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 if ((buffer = (char *)memalign(4096, BSIZE)) == 0)
   exit(EXIT_FAILURE);

 for (;;)  {
   if (read(fd[0], buffer, BSIZE) != BSIZE)
     break;
   if (read(fd[1], buffer, BSIZE) != BSIZE)
     break;
 }
 close(fd[0]);
 close(fd[1]);
 free(buffer);
 return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
----------------------8<----------------------8<----------------------

Any help/hint would be appreciate.

-- R.C
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/