[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709192129.23034.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:29:22 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:00, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 09:30 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> + /* gzip header (1f,8b,08... 10 bytes total + possible asciz filename)
> + * is stripped, 32-bit unpacked size (LE) is prepended instead */
> + sz = *zbuf++;
> + sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
> + sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
> + sz = (sz << 8) + *zbuf++;
>
> I don't have a problem with removing the gzip header. It doesn't
> contain very useful information other than a valid header for sanity
> check. But I don't think we need to arbitrarily add the unpacked size
> in front of the gzipped data. The driver knows the size (e.g. the size
> of RAM on the chip) and should pass it to the call. The driver should
> also allocate the memory for the unpacked data instead of allocating the
> memory inside the call and freeing it by the caller. For example, the
> driver may need to use pci_alloc_consistent() if the firmware is to be
> DMA'ed to the chip.
>
> Other than that, everything else looks fine. Thanks.
Are you saying that you successfully run-tested it?
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists