[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F199CC.4080600@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:51:08 -0400
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
To: "Andries E. Brouwer" <Andries.Brouwer@....nl>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iso9660 vs udf
Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> That is,
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> works fine, but
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
> I will try type udf
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdc,
> missing codepage or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
> # dmesg | tail
> UDF-fs INFO UDF 0.9.8.1 (2004/29/09) Mounting volume 'Wisk1956-82', timestamp 2006/03/07 16:26 (1078)
> udf: udf_read_inode(ino 547) failed !bh
> UDF-fs: Error in udf_iget, block=1, partition=1
What does the line for hdc show in /etc/fstab? Mount tries whichever
filesystem(s) is/are listed there if you omit -t. My guess is that it
only lists udf and this is a cd so it contains iso9660, not udf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists