lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070919150724.4e64829a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:07:24 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:47:23 -0700 Dave Hansen wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 18:26 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > 
> > > Christoph H. says this stands on its own and can go in before the
> > > rest of the r/o bind mount set.  
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Some filesystems forego the vfs and may_open() and create their
> > > own 'struct file's.
> > > 
> > > This patch creates a couple of helper functions which can be
> > > used by these filesystems, and will provide a unified place
> > > which the r/o bind mount code may patch.
> > > 
> > > Also, rename an existing, static-scope init_file() to a less
> > > generic name.
> > 
> > Looks good.  But please provide a patch ontop of your patchkit to
> > add kernel-doc comments for the two new exported functions.
> 
> Appended.  I started to write the comments to describe the function
> arguments, but they all looked pretty retarded.  

Hi Dave,

They aren't quite in kernel-doc format.  Holler if you need help
with that, or see examples, or
Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.

> > Are there any direct caller of get_empty_filp left after this patch?
> > We really should get rid of that export to stop people from shooting
> > themselves in the foot.
> 
> Yeah, there are a few left.  But, they're in the middle of what is
> sometimes tricky error handling, so I think we should trickle those in
> later. 
> 
> 
> -- Dave
> 
>  lxc-dave/fs/file_table.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -puN fs/file_table.c~document fs/file_table.c
> --- lxc/fs/file_table.c~document	2007-09-19 10:31:13.000000000 -0700
> +++ lxc-dave/fs/file_table.c	2007-09-19 10:39:34.000000000 -0700
> @@ -137,6 +137,18 @@ fail:
>  
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_empty_filp);
>  
> +/**
> + * alloc_file - allocate and initialize a 'struct file' with
> + * the given arguments

    * function_name - short description (on one line)
    * @param1: descr1
    * @param2: descr2
  etc.

> + *
> + * Use this instead of get_empty_filp() to get a new
> + * 'struct file'.  Do so because of the same initialization
> + * pitfalls reasons listed for init_file().  This is a
> + * preferred interface to using init_file().
> + *
> + * If all the callers of init_file() are eliminated, its
> + * code should be moved into this function.
> + */
>  struct file *alloc_file(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
>  		mode_t mode, const struct file_operations *fop)
>  {
> @@ -152,7 +164,15 @@ struct file *alloc_file(struct vfsmount 
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_file);
>  
> -/*
> +/**
> + * init_file - initialize a 'struct file'
> + * @file: the already allocated 'struct file' to initialized
> + * @mnt: the vfsmount on which the file resides
> + *
> + * Use this instead of setting the members directly.  Doing so
> + * avoids making mistakes like forgetting the mntget() or
> + * forgetting to take a write on the mnt.
> + *
>   * Note: This is a crappy interface.  It is here to make
>   * merging with the existing users of get_empty_filp()
>   * who have complex failure logic easier.  All users

OK, that one looks better.  :)

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ