[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709182131560.16478@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>,
swin wang <wangswin@...il.com>, totty.lu@...il.com,
hugh@...itas.com, joern@...ybastard.org
Subject: Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>
> I do feel larger blocksizes continue to make sense in general though. Packet
> writing on CD/DVD is a problem already today since the hardware needs 32K or
> 64K blocks and I'd expect to see more of these and similiar situations when
> flash gets (even) more popular which it sort of inevitably is going to be.
.. that's what scatter-gather exists for.
What's so hard with just realizing that physical memory isn't contiguous?
It's why we have MMU's. It's why we have scatter-gather.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists