linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 2/2] i386/x86_64 boot: document for 32 bit boot protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1190180110.12429.65.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:35:10 +0800
From:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v2 2/2] i386/x86_64 boot: document for 32 bit boot
	protocol

On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 22:30 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Huang, Ying wrote:
> > Known issues:
> > 
> > - The hd0_info and hd1_info are deleted from the zero page. Additional
> >   work should be done for this? Or this is unnecessary (because no new
> >   fields will be added to zero page)?
> > 
> 
> For backwards compatibility, they should be marked as there for the
> short-medium term so we don't reuse them for whatever reason.

OK, I will add them back.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/