[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10709.1190276115@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:15:15 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
casey@...aufler-ca.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] CRED: Move the effective capabilities into the cred struct
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org> wrote:
> OOC If we were to simply drop support for one process changing the
> capabilities of another, would we need this patch?
Well, the patch could be less, but there's still the possibility of a kernel
service wanting to override the capabilities mask.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists