[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F23198.6070004@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:38:48 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix potential OOPS in generic_setlease()
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 06:26:05PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> This code is run under lock_kernel(), which is dropped during
>> sleeping operations, so the following race is possible:
>>
>> CPU1: CPU2:
>> vfs_setlease(); vfs_setlease();
>> lock_kernel();
>> lock_kernel(); /* spin */
>> generic_setlease():
>> ...
>> for (before = ...)
>> /* here we found some lease after
>> * which we will insert the new one
>> */
>> fl = locks_alloc_lock();
>> /* go to sleep in this allocation and
>> * drop the BKL
>> */
>> generic_setlease():
>> ...
>> for (before = ...)
>> /* here we find the "before" pointing
>> * at the one we found on CPU1
>> */
>> ->fl_change(my_before, arg);
>> lease_modify();
>> locks_free_lock();
>> /* and we freed it */
>> ...
>> unlock_kernel();
>> locks_insert_lock(before, fl);
>> /* OOPS! We have just tried to add the lease
>> * at the tail of already removed one
>> */
>
> Thanks for spotting this!
>
> But--careful-- it looks like "fl" is also used as a temporary variable
> in a loop between the new and old location of that allocation. Isn't
> that a bug?
OOPS! Good catch, thanks. I will resend the patch shortly.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists