linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 -- mkfs stuck in 'D'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070920141531.534502c1@twins>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:15:31 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>,
	spamtrap@...bisoft.de
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 -- mkfs stuck in 'D'

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:31:39 +0100 (BST) Hugh Dickins
<hugh@...itas.com> wrote:


Thanks Hugh!

> [PATCH mm] mm per-device dirty threshold fix
> 
> Fix occasional hang when a task couldn't get out of balance_dirty_pages:
> mm-per-device-dirty-threshold.patch needs to reevaluate bdi_nr_writeback
> across all cpus when bdi_thresh is low, even in the case when there was
> no bdi_nr_reclaimable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>

> ---
>  mm/page-writeback.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> --- 2.6.23-rc6-mm1/mm/page-writeback.c	2007-09-18 12:28:25.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c	2007-09-19 20:00:46.000000000 +0100
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
>  		bdi_nr_reclaimable = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
>  		bdi_nr_writeback = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
>  		if (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback <= bdi_thresh)
> -				break;
> +			break;
>  
>  		if (!bdi->dirty_exceeded)
>  			bdi->dirty_exceeded = 1;
> @@ -392,39 +392,34 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
>  		 */
>  		if (bdi_nr_reclaimable) {
>  			writeback_inodes(&wbc);
> -
> +			pages_written += write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
>  			get_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh,
>  				       &bdi_thresh, bdi);
> +		}
>  
> -			/*
> -			 * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need
> -			 * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when
> -			 * the threshold is low.
> -			 *
> -			 * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages
> -			 * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages
> -			 * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu
> -			 * deltas.
> -			 */
> -			if (bdi_thresh < 2*bdi_stat_error(bdi)) {
> -				bdi_nr_reclaimable =
> -					bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> -				bdi_nr_writeback =
> -					bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
> -			} else {
> -				bdi_nr_reclaimable =
> -					bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> -				bdi_nr_writeback =
> -					bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
> -			}
> +		/*
> +		 * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need
> +		 * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when
> +		 * the threshold is low.
> +		 *
> +		 * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages
> +		 * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages
> +		 * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu
> +		 * deltas.
> +		 */
> +		if (bdi_thresh < 2*bdi_stat_error(bdi)) {
> +			bdi_nr_reclaimable = bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> +			bdi_nr_writeback = bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
> +		} else if (bdi_nr_reclaimable) {
> +			bdi_nr_reclaimable = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> +			bdi_nr_writeback = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
> +		}
>  
> -			if (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback <= bdi_thresh)
> -				break;
> +		if (bdi_nr_reclaimable + bdi_nr_writeback <= bdi_thresh)
> +			break;
> +		if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
> +			break;		/* We've done our duty */
>  
> -			pages_written += write_chunk - wbc.nr_to_write;
> -			if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
> -				break;		/* We've done our duty */
> -		}
>  		congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
>  	}
>  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/