[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F2957F.60707@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:15:03 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1: Build failure on ppc64 drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:13:15 +0100
> mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman) wrote:
>
>
>> PPC64 building allmodconfig fails to compile drivers/ata/pata_scc.c . It
>> doesn't show up on other arches because this driver is specific to the
>> architecture.
>>
>> drivers/ata/pata_scc.c: In function `scc_bmdma_status'
>>
>
> Its not been updated to match the libata core changes. Try something like
> this. Whoever is maintaining it should also remove the prereset cable handling
> code and use the proper cable detect method.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
>
> diff -u --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude --new-file --recursive linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c linux-2.6.23rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
> --- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c 2007-09-18 15:32:51.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.23rc6-mm1/drivers/ata/pata_scc.c 2007-09-20 14:23:32.879807760 +0100
> @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@
> void __iomem *mmio = ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr;
> u8 host_stat = in_be32(mmio + SCC_DMA_STATUS);
> u32 int_status = in_be32(mmio + SCC_DMA_INTST);
> - struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->active_tag);
> + struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->link.active_tag);
> static int retry = 0;
>
> /* return if IOS_SS is cleared */
> @@ -860,10 +860,10 @@
> * @deadline: deadline jiffies for the operation
> */
>
> -static int scc_pata_prereset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned long deadline)
> +static int scc_pata_prereset(struct ata_link *link, unsigned long deadline)
> {
> - ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_PATA80;
> - return ata_std_prereset(ap, deadline);
> + link->ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_PATA80;
> + return ata_std_prereset(link, deadline);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -874,8 +874,9 @@
> * Note: Original code is ata_std_postreset().
> */
>
> -static void scc_std_postreset (struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
> +static void scc_std_postreset (struct ata_link *link, unsigned int *classes)
> {
>
> - ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_PATA80;
> - return ata_std_prereset(ap, deadline);
> + link->ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_PATA80;
> + return ata_std_prereset(link, deadline);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -874,8 +874,9 @@
> * Note: Original code is ata_std_postreset().
> */
>
> + struct ata_port *ap = link->ap;
> DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
>
> /* is double-select really necessary? */
>
>
Hi,
This patch solves the build failure, but with following warnings
CC drivers/ata/pata_scc.o
drivers/ata/pata_scc.c: In function ‘scc_error_handler’:
drivers/ata/pata_scc.c:909: warning: passing argument 3 of
‘ata_bmdma_drive_eh’ from incompatible pointer type
and after that the build fails with
CC [M] drivers/net/spider_net.o
drivers/net/spider_net.c: In function ‘spider_net_release_tx_chain’:
drivers/net/spider_net.c:818: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/net/spider_net.c:818: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
drivers/net/spider_net.c:818: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/net/spider_net.c: In function ‘spider_net_xmit’:
drivers/net/spider_net.c:922: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
drivers/net/spider_net.c: In function ‘spider_net_pass_skb_up’:
drivers/net/spider_net.c:1018: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
drivers/net/spider_net.c: In function ‘spider_net_decode_one_descr’:
drivers/net/spider_net.c:1215: error: ‘dev’ undeclared (first use in
this function)
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/spider_net.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists