[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070920155302.GA29224@shadowen.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:53:02 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: error from checkpatch.pl version 0.10
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:19:59PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >
> > I checked my patch using checkpatch.pl version 0.10
> > and I got the following error.
> >
> > ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxV)
> > #2334: FILE: security/tomoyo/common.c:2306:
> > +static unsigned int tmy_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> > ^
>
> Looks like a checkpatch.pl bug to me -- that was nothing to warn about.
Hmm yeah this is a false positive, its hard to detect correctly. Some
fool decided to use * as both a unary and binary operator and made life
very hard indeed. Most kernel defined types end _t to aid recognition.
This one does no. I may special case it. Either way ignore its
moaning!
> > What action should I take?
> > Ignore this error because "poll_table" is used everywhere?
> > Replace "poll_table" with "struct poll_table_struct" according to
> > definition of "poll_table"?
>
> Yeah, this would be better to do anyway (and rename poll_table_struct
> to just poll_table).
>
> > typedef struct poll_table_struct {
> > poll_queue_proc qproc;
> > } poll_table;
>
> So:
>
> struct poll_table {
> poll_queue_proc qproc;
> };
>
> In general the kernel's codingstyle consensus is to avoid adding typedefs.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists