[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709201749240.30788@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:28:49 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/printk.c: Concerns about the console handover
Move the hadover message to after the boot console has been released to
avoid bad interactions between it and the real console.
Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...ux-mips.org>
---
The 69331af79cf29e26d1231152a172a1a10c2df511 commit of May 8th added a
"console handover: ..." message to register_console() that is output
during the short period when both the boot and the newly-registered
console are registered.
This is presumably fine for boot consoles implemented entirely by Linux
as they are fully controlled. But it may produce problems when the boot
console is actually implemented as a call to the firmware which may not be
quite happy about how the OS driver for the piece of hardware involved
controls it.
I hit this problem with the DECstation. Depending on the configuration
the fimrware uses a graphics adapter or a predefined serial port for
console output -- which device actually that is cannot be reliably
determined by Linux, though an approximation may be possible. Now if the
firmware uses the serial port and Linux is asked to use the same serial
port for the real console, then this printk() hangs forever in the
firmware. The driver used is drivers/serial/zs.c.
The reason is by the time the ->write() call is issued for the boot
console as a result of this printk(), the zs.c driver has been initialised
and because at the moment the serial port has not been opened, the serial
transmitter is disabled. The firmware polls for the transmit buffer empty
condition, but does not enable the module, presumably under the assumption
it will not be called once an OS driver has taken control of the device
(the register containing the enable bit is write-only anyway, so it would
be hard to restore the previous value). This causes a hang, because once
a single character is put into the transmit buffer it will not become
empty until the transmitter has been enabled.
The serial console as implemented by zs.c handles the case correctly, by
enabling the transmitter, outputting what should be output, waiting for
the transmit shift register to drain and restoring the state of the
transmitter enable (which is held in a shadow variable).
I feel a bit uneasy about keeping serial transmitters enabled for lines
that have not been opened; I gather others may agree as for example while
not explicitly mentioned, I believe it is implied by what is said in
Documentation/serial/driver referring to the ->shutdown() call: "Disable
the port, [...]" -- with the transmitter enabled a port can hardly be
considered fully disabled. Below is a change which makes the problem
disappear for me, but I suppose there was a deliberate reason for placing
the printk() where it is now and nowhere else.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Maciej
patch-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904-printk-handover-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/kernel/printk.c linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/kernel/printk.c
--- linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904.macro/kernel/printk.c 2007-09-04 04:56:21.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.6.23-rc5-20070904/kernel/printk.c 2007-09-19 21:10:16.000000000 +0000
@@ -1014,11 +1014,11 @@ void register_console(struct console *co
return;
if (bootconsole && (console->flags & CON_CONSDEV)) {
+ unregister_console(bootconsole);
+ console->flags &= ~CON_PRINTBUFFER;
printk(KERN_INFO "console handover: boot [%s%d] -> real [%s%d]\n",
bootconsole->name, bootconsole->index,
console->name, console->index);
- unregister_console(bootconsole);
- console->flags &= ~CON_PRINTBUFFER;
} else {
printk(KERN_INFO "console [%s%d] enabled\n",
console->name, console->index);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists