[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070920214447.GB8496@halcrow.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:44:47 -0500
From: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
ecryptfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11] eCryptfs: Replace encrypt, decrypt, and inode size write
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:46:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
(from ecryptfs_encrypt_page()):
> > + enc_extent_virt = kmalloc(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, GFP_USER);
>
> I'd have thought that alloc_page() would be nicer. After all, we _are_
> treating it as a page, and not as a random piece of memry.
>
> > + if (!enc_extent_virt) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + ecryptfs_printk(KERN_ERR, "Error allocating memory for "
> > + "encrypted extent\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + enc_extent_page = virt_to_page(enc_extent_virt);
>
> And then we don't need this.
If neither kmap() nor kmap_atomic() can be safely used to get a
virtual address to pass to vfs_write(), then I do not know what my
other options are here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists