[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709211334420.2724@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:51:12 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> You always put boring, crappy, insufficient text in the for-the-changelog
> section and interesting, useful, sufficient text in the not-for-the-changelog
> section.
I'll swap the sections in the future then. ;-) Frankly I was not sure
whether the changelog was happy about being fed with lengthy explanations
and it has not spoken out.
I have to admit this is a habit carried over from the FSF-style ChangeLog
-- where the enforced rule is actually *not* to provide any explanation
for why changes are done and only describe what has been modified (with
any discussion around archived in the respective mailing list).
> But you can't fool me! I have an editor and I fix it up.
Thank you and sorry for the extra work I caused you -- I shall keep your
suggestion in mind in the future.
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists