[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0709210925490.24225@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:27:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
--
>
> This has been wondering me some time. Kernel oopses also use [<%p>],
> but what really for are two sort of braces needed?
I believe the notation of [<some-hex-number>] has always been a
representation of instruction pointer. Seems that's what's used for all
outputs of instruction pointers that I've seen (well most really).
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists