lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070921184400.GQ32520@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:44:00 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/5] VFS: pass open file to ->xattr()

On Sep 21, 2007  16:59 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> What I'm saying is that read and write are _no_more_ related to the
> file than fstat.  Read/write operate on inode data, fstat operates on
> inode metadata.

The read and write operations are DEFINITELY related to the file descriptor
because of f_pos.  Each process opening the same file can have a different
f_pos so read/write will work in different locations of the file.

In contrast getattr and getxattr operate on the single inode and you don't
get e.g. a different i_size or i_uid or i_gid depending on who opened a
file, nor is the xattr different.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ