[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070921204500.0B91314EFF@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:44:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: padator@...adoo.fr, ak@...e.de, discuss@...-64.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, patches@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [18/45] x86_64: 0 -> NULL, for arch/x86_64
From: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: ak@...e.de
Cc: discuss@...-64.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
---
arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long
return __va(mem);
ptr = __alloc_bootmem_nopanic(size,
SMP_CACHE_BYTES, __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS));
- if (ptr == 0) {
+ if (ptr == NULL) {
printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n",
size, nodeid);
return NULL;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists