[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070921204514.DF01414EFF@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:45:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: vapier@...too.org, patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KERNEL__
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
This brings x86_64 into line with all other architectures by only defining
cond_syscall() when __KERNEL__ is defined.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
---
include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Index: linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
+++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h
@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __NO_STUBS */
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
/*
* "Conditional" syscalls
*
@@ -683,5 +684,6 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig
* but it doesn't work on all toolchains, so we just do it by hand
*/
#define cond_syscall(x) asm(".weak\t" #x "\n\t.set\t" #x ",sys_ni_syscall")
+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_64_UNISTD_H_ */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists