[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F44D27.4050704@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:00:55 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [50/50] x86_64: Remove fpu io port resource
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Not needed on modern systems without external FPU
>
> TBD on i386 it is only needed for true 386s. Could remove it there
> TBD for >= 486
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
>
> ---
> arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -121,8 +121,6 @@ struct resource standard_io_resources[]
> .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO },
> { .name = "dma2", .start = 0xc0, .end = 0xdf,
> .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO },
> - { .name = "fpu", .start = 0xf0, .end = 0xff,
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO }
Since we are merging x86 and x86-64, I think it would be nice at least
to CC Thomas on patches that increase 32/64-bit differences... because
won't this patch have to be partial un-done when we merge i386 and x86-64?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists