linux-kernel - Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:05:22 -0500
From:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>,
	linux-tiny@...enic.com,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>,
	CE Linux Developers List <celinux-dev@...e.celinuxforum.org>,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Announce] Linux-tiny project revival

On Friday 21 September 2007 12:45:27 pm Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:16 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > What about something *really* hardcore ugly like:
> > #ifdef __FILE__
> > #undef __FILE__
> > #define __FILE__ ""
> > #endif
> > (or similar preprocessor blecherousness) if you want to *really* shrink
> > that binary down?
>
> I prefer removing all __FILE__, __FUNCTION__, __LINE__ uses
> from printks and defining something that modifies pr_<level>.

pr_level doesn't exist in mainline.

> #define pr_info(fmt, arg) printk(KERN_INFO PR_FMT fmt PR_ARG, ##arg)

Do we really need another layer of indirection?

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/