linux-kernel - Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709221619430.22085@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>, geoff@...are.org.uk,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
Subject: Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API

On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 14:07 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > 
> > > So I'm inclined to implement option (b), unless someone has strong
> > > objections.  Davide, could I persuade you to help?
> > 
> > I guess I better do, otherwise you'll continue to stress me ;)
> > 
> > int timerfd_create(int clockid);
> > int timerfd_settime(int ufd, int flags,
> >                     const struct itimerspec *utmr,
> >                     struct itimerspec *otmr);
> > int timerfd_gettime(int ufd, struct itimerspec *otmr);
> > 
> > Patch below. Builds, not tested yet (you need to remove the "broken" 
> > status from CONFIG_TIMERFD in case you want to test - and plug the new 
> > syscall to arch/xxx).
> > May that work for you?
> > Thomas-san, hrtimer_try_to_cancel() does not touch ->expires and I assume
> > it'll never do, granted?
> 
> Davide-san, I have no intention to change that, but remember there is
> this file "Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt" :)

Heh, I guess that'll work then ;)



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/