[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709220441090.21302@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: memset as memzero
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> could anyone tell me why there is no official memzero function (or
> macros) in the kernel. As I see a lot of kernel parts calls for it
> (defying own macros as alias to memset). Maybe there is a special
> reason not to do so? Actually my suggestion is to define _one_
> general macros for this.
i brought up this issue on the KJ list once upon a time:
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/kernel-janitors/2007-February/017847.html
and there didn't seem to be much enthusiasm for it.
however, i am still curious why there isn't more use of the
already-defined "clear_page" macro. most architectures appear to
define it:
$ grep -r "define.*clear_page" include
but there are still numerous explicit calls to memset() to zero a
chunk of memory that is exactly PAGE_SIZE in size. just an
observation.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists