[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F5128A.8050509@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:03:06 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>
To: David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, davidel@...ilserver.org,
drepper@...hat.com, geoff@...are.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hch@....de, corbet@....net, rdunlap@...otime.net,
vda.linux@...glemail.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
lee.schermerhorn@...com
Subject: Re: RFC: A revised timerfd API
David Härdeman wrote:
> On Tue, September 18, 2007 13:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> timer_gettime(fd | POSIX_TIMER_FD, .....);
>> If we use the most significant bit for POSIX_TIMER_FD, we should be
>> fine.
>
> I think alternative b) - three new syscalls, sounds better.
>
> The only negatives so far are that it adds more syscalls and that it might
> require code duplication with posix timers. The syscall numbers argument
> seemed not to be very important and the code duplication should be fixable
> by refactoring the code so that more is shared between the two systems (I
> assume).
Yes, I'm inclined to agree with you on both points.
> Overloading file descriptors with flags looks ugly, is there any other
> syscall which does that?
AFAIK there is no other syscall that does that. I agree that it's not very
pretty.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists