linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.23-rc7 + radeonfb/s2ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1IZZ37-0001OI-8g@flower>
Date:	Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:31:33 +0200
From:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To:	Mihai Dontu <mihai.dontu@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc7 + radeonfb/s2ram

* Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:22:28 +0300
* Organization: Home

[]
>> > 
>> >   So there, if one wants "ATI Radeon display support" on Radeon XPRESS 200M with
>> >   X using radeon_drv.so, *should* put "Framebuffer Console support" to N (if it's
>> >   not already).
[]
>   Bottom line: no radeonfb for me :( at least, not now; but I have to be honest with
>   you: I don't see what commit dd1447134454b169d5ae353aceb93f2368db8547 brought new
>   into the picture. The previous radeonfb worked just great, but then, again, maybe I'm
>   not using the console at it's full power :)

In fact, it's known statement, that there must only one hardware driver
for graphic adapter. Be it framebuffer with X fb driver on it or legacy
VGA text and X with its driver.so and 3D stuff.

(i choose legacy text without X for the most of my time, though :)
_____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/