[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070923055303.GA14899@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:53:03 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG 2.6.23-rc6-mm1] NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 0
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 10:35:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:30:40 +0800 Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
>
> > > That's interensting. serial_in(). We have had NMI watchdog expiries when
> > > the kernel is printing a large amount of stuff out a slow serial port with
> > > interrutps disabled. But I thought we'd pretty much plugged those problems
> > > by sprinkling touch_nmi_watchdog() in various places.
> > >
> > > Do you think this is what was happening on your system?
> >
> > Very likely. I'm running linux with cmdline
> > "root=/dev/sda1 ro nmi_watchdog=1 console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0",
> > and doing a lot of printks at the time ;-)
>
> OK. We need to find a suitable place to poke yet another
> touch_nmi_watchdog(). Maybe we should give up and put one in
> printk().
>
> And you oopsed for different reasons in the nmi-watchdog handling
> code too. I think I'll pretend I didn't see that.
Let's forget it for now.
I can try Ingo's latency tracing patches at some convenient time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists