[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070924123813.GB17409@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:38:13 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no,
adilger@...sterfs.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] VFS: allow filesystem to override mknod capability checks
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:25:54PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
>
> Add a new super block flag, that results in the VFS not checking if
> the current process has enough privileges to do an mknod().
>
> If this flag is set, all mounts for this super block will have the
> "nodev" flag implied.
>
> This is needed on filesystems, where an unprivileged user may be able
> to create a device node, without causing security problems.
>
> One such example is "mountlo" a loopback mount utility implemented
> with fuse and UML, which runs as an unprivileged userspace process.
> In this case the user does in fact have the right to create device
> nodes within the filesystem image, as long as the user has write
> access to the image. Since the filesystem is mounted with "nodev",
> adding device nodes is not a security concern.
This one looks okay, but I'd prefer to not put it in until we actually
have proper non-privilegued mounts.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists